import ComparisonTable from ’../../components/ComparisonTable.astro’;
Prometheus and InfluxDB are both time series databases designed for metrics, but they have fundamentally different designs, ecosystems, and strengths. Prometheus is a pull-based system built for cloud-native monitoring with excellent Kubernetes integration. InfluxDB is a push-based system built for high-volume time series data with strong IoT and analytics capabilities.
Quick Verdict
Choose Prometheus if: Kubernetes monitoring, cloud-native infrastructure, Grafana ecosystem, or you want the industry-standard open-source observability stack.
Choose InfluxDB if: IoT sensor data, industrial time series, need longer data retention at scale, SQL-familiar team, or want a managed time series cloud (InfluxDB Cloud).
Feature Comparison
<ComparisonTable headers={[“Feature”, “Prometheus”, “InfluxDB”]} rows={[ [“Data model”, “Metric + labels (key-value)”, “Measurement + tags + fields”], [“Collection model”, “Pull (scrapes endpoints)”, “Push (write API)”], [“Query language”, “PromQL”, “Flux / SQL (InfluxDB v3)”], [“Storage”, “Local (TSDB)”, “IOx columnar (v3) / TSM (v2)”], [“Retention”, “Limited (disk-based, default 15d)”, “Configurable (unlimited)”], [“Alerting”, “Alertmanager (separate)”, “Built-in alerting”], [“Kubernetes native”, “Excellent”, “Manual setup”], [“Cardinality limit”, “~10M series (practical)”, “Higher cardinality support”], [“Managed cloud”, “Grafana Cloud (Mimir)”, “InfluxDB Cloud”], [“Long-term storage”, “Thanos/Cortex/Mimir”, “Built-in”], [“High availability”, “External (Thanos)”, “Built-in clustering”], [“Ecosystem”, “CNCF, Grafana, huge”, “InfluxData ecosystem”], [“IoT suitability”, “Limited”, “Excellent”], [“License”, “Apache 2.0”, “MIT (v2), Source Available (v3)”], ]} />
Prometheus Architecture
Prometheus is a pull-based monitoring system — it actively scrapes HTTP endpoints that expose metrics:
How Prometheus works:
Target (your app) Prometheus Grafana
/metrics endpoint → scrapes every 15s → queries PromQL → Dashboard
Alertmanager ← evaluation rules
↓
PagerDuty / Slack / email
Instrumentation (Python):
from prometheus_client import Counter, Histogram, Gauge, start_http_server
import time
# Define metrics
REQUEST_COUNT = Counter(
'http_requests_total',
'Total HTTP requests',
['method', 'endpoint', 'status_code']
)
REQUEST_LATENCY = Histogram(
'http_request_duration_seconds',
'HTTP request latency',
['method', 'endpoint'],
buckets=[.005, .01, .025, .05, .1, .25, .5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10]
)
ACTIVE_CONNECTIONS = Gauge(
'active_connections',
'Number of active connections'
)
# Use in your application
def handle_request(method, endpoint):
start = time.time()
ACTIVE_CONNECTIONS.inc()
try:
response = process_request(method, endpoint)
REQUEST_COUNT.labels(
method=method,
endpoint=endpoint,
status_code=response.status_code
).inc()
return response
finally:
ACTIVE_CONNECTIONS.dec()
REQUEST_LATENCY.labels(
method=method,
endpoint=endpoint
).observe(time.time() - start)
# Expose /metrics endpoint (port 8000)
start_http_server(8000)
Prometheus configuration:
# prometheus.yml
global:
scrape_interval: 15s
evaluation_interval: 15s
rule_files:
- "alert_rules.yml"
alerting:
alertmanagers:
- static_configs:
- targets: ['alertmanager:9093']
scrape_configs:
# Scrape Prometheus itself
- job_name: 'prometheus'
static_configs:
- targets: ['localhost:9090']
# Scrape your application
- job_name: 'my-app'
static_configs:
- targets: ['app:8000']
# Kubernetes pod discovery
- job_name: 'kubernetes-pods'
kubernetes_sd_configs:
- role: pod
relabel_configs:
# Only scrape pods with annotation
- source_labels: [__meta_kubernetes_pod_annotation_prometheus_io_scrape]
action: keep
regex: true
# Use custom port if specified
- source_labels: [__meta_kubernetes_pod_annotation_prometheus_io_port]
action: replace
target_label: __address__
regex: (.+)
replacement: ${1}
# Node exporter (host metrics)
- job_name: 'node-exporter'
static_configs:
- targets: ['node-exporter:9100']
PromQL queries:
# Request rate (per second, last 5 minutes)
rate(http_requests_total[5m])
# Error rate
rate(http_requests_total{status_code=~"5.."}[5m])
/ rate(http_requests_total[5m])
# P99 latency
histogram_quantile(0.99,
rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])
)
# CPU usage by pod
100 - (avg by (pod) (rate(container_cpu_usage_seconds_total[5m])) * 100)
# Memory usage > 80%
container_memory_usage_bytes / container_spec_memory_limit_bytes > 0.8
Alerting rules:
# alert_rules.yml
groups:
- name: application
rules:
- alert: HighErrorRate
expr: |
rate(http_requests_total{status_code=~"5.."}[5m])
/ rate(http_requests_total[5m]) > 0.05
for: 5m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "High error rate on {{ $labels.job }}"
description: "Error rate is {{ $value | humanizePercentage }}"
- alert: HighLatency
expr: |
histogram_quantile(0.99,
rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])
) > 1.0
for: 10m
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "P99 latency above 1 second"
InfluxDB Architecture
InfluxDB uses a push model — applications write data to InfluxDB’s API:
InfluxDB data model:
Measurement: http_requests
Tags (indexed, for filtering):
method=GET, endpoint=/api/users, status_code=200
Fields (numeric data):
count=1, duration_ms=45.2
Timestamp: 2025-01-15T10:30:00Z
Line protocol (wire format):
http_requests,method=GET,endpoint=/api/users,status_code=200 count=1i,duration_ms=45.2 1705312200000000000
Writing data (Python):
from influxdb_client import InfluxDBClient, Point
from influxdb_client.client.write_api import SYNCHRONOUS
import time
client = InfluxDBClient(
url="http://influxdb:8086",
token="your-token",
org="my-org"
)
write_api = client.write_api(write_options=SYNCHRONOUS)
def record_request(method, endpoint, status_code, duration_ms):
point = (
Point("http_requests")
.tag("method", method)
.tag("endpoint", endpoint)
.tag("status_code", str(status_code))
.field("count", 1)
.field("duration_ms", duration_ms)
)
write_api.write(
bucket="metrics",
org="my-org",
record=point
)
# IoT sensor data
def record_sensor(sensor_id, location, temperature, humidity, pressure):
point = (
Point("environment")
.tag("sensor_id", sensor_id)
.tag("location", location)
.field("temperature", temperature)
.field("humidity", humidity)
.field("pressure", pressure)
)
write_api.write(bucket="sensors", org="my-org", record=point)
Flux queries (InfluxDB v2):
// Error rate over last 5 minutes
from(bucket: "metrics")
|> range(start: -5m)
|> filter(fn: (r) => r._measurement == "http_requests")
|> filter(fn: (r) => r.status_code =~ /5\d\d/)
|> count()
|> map(fn: (r) => ({r with _value: float(v: r._value) / total}))
// Mean temperature by location (last hour)
from(bucket: "sensors")
|> range(start: -1h)
|> filter(fn: (r) => r._measurement == "environment")
|> filter(fn: (r) => r._field == "temperature")
|> group(columns: ["location"])
|> mean()
SQL queries (InfluxDB v3):
-- P99 latency by endpoint
SELECT
endpoint,
PERCENTILE_CONT(0.99) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY duration_ms) as p99_latency
FROM http_requests
WHERE time >= now() - INTERVAL '5 minutes'
AND status_code < 500
GROUP BY endpoint
ORDER BY p99_latency DESC;
-- Sensor data downsampling for long-term storage
SELECT
DATE_BIN('1 hour', time, '1970-01-01') as hour,
location,
AVG(temperature) as avg_temp,
MIN(temperature) as min_temp,
MAX(temperature) as max_temp
FROM environment
WHERE time >= '2025-01-01'
GROUP BY hour, location
ORDER BY hour;
Long-Term Storage Solutions
Prometheus long-term storage:
# Thanos — adds long-term storage to Prometheus
# Thanos sidecar uploads Prometheus blocks to object storage
thanos-sidecar:
image: thanosio/thanos:v0.34.0
args:
- sidecar
- --prometheus.url=http://prometheus:9090
- --objstore.config=$(OBJSTORE_CONFIG)
# OBJSTORE_CONFIG points to S3/GCS/Azure bucket config
thanos-query:
# Query across multiple Prometheus instances and object storage
- --store=thanos-sidecar:10091
- --store=thanos-store:10091 # Historical data from object storage
InfluxDB handles this natively — configure retention periods per bucket.
When to Choose Each
Choose Prometheus:
- Kubernetes and cloud-native infrastructure monitoring
- Integration with Grafana, AlertManager, and CNCF ecosystem
- Developer/SRE teams familiar with PromQL
- Application metrics (RED method: Rate, Error, Duration)
- When you want operator flexibility and open source control
Choose InfluxDB:
- IoT and industrial sensor data (high write volume, irregular intervals)
- Need longer built-in retention without external solutions
- Teams who prefer SQL over PromQL (InfluxDB v3)
- Time series analytics beyond monitoring (business metrics, financial data)
- Managed cloud with less operational burden (InfluxDB Cloud)
Bottom Line
For cloud-native and Kubernetes environments, Prometheus is the default choice — it’s the CNCF standard with the widest ecosystem support and Grafana integration. For IoT, industrial, or use cases needing long-term time series storage with SQL queries, InfluxDB is often the better fit. Many mature observability stacks use both: Prometheus for infrastructure and application metrics (short retention, fast queries), InfluxDB for business metrics and long-term trend storage. The Prometheus + Grafana + Alertmanager stack has become so standard in cloud-native that choosing anything else requires justification.